ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Analiza modularității direcționate×Centralitatea de intermediere×
DomeniuAnaliza rețelelorAnaliza rețelelor
FamilieMachine learningMachine learning
Anul apariției20081977
Autorul originalLeicht, E. A. & Newman, M. E. J.Freeman, L. C.
TipCommunity detection / graph partitioningCentrality measure
Sursa seminalăLeicht, E. A., & Newman, M. E. J. (2008). Community structure in directed networks. Physical Review Letters, 100(11), 118703. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
Denumiri alternativedirected community detection via modularity, directed Q-modularity, digraph modularity optimization, Leicht-Newman modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Înrudite56
RezumatDirected modularity analysis extends the classic Newman-Girvan modularity framework to directed graphs, where edges carry a source and a destination. Formalized by Leicht and Newman in 2008, it partitions nodes into communities by maximizing a modularity score that accounts for each node's separate in-degree and out-degree in the null model, making it the standard approach for community detection in citation networks, information flows, and other asymmetric relational data.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: Directed Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Preluat la 2026-06-15 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare