Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Metoda Istoriei Orale Digitale× | Metoda istoriei orale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Metode de teren | Metode de teren |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2000s (digital variant of oral history established 1940s–1950s) | 1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s |
| Autorul original≠ | Oral History Association; Donald Ritchie; Alessandro Portelli (digital turn elaborated early 2000s) | Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative field research method | Qualitative historical-empirical method |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195154344 | Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960 |
| Denumiri alternative | digital oral history, DOH, digital life history interview, digital recorded oral testimony | oral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | The digital oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which personal testimonies and lived experiences are elicited through recorded interviews, then preserved, managed, and disseminated using digital technologies. Building on the established oral history tradition, the digital variant leverages audio and video recording equipment, digital archiving platforms, and online dissemination channels to expand access, ensure long-term preservation, and enable richer multi-modal analysis of narrator accounts. | The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|