ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Definirea interrelațiilor între criterii ierarhizate×Evaluare Aditivă a Raportului×
DomeniuLuarea deciziilorLuarea deciziilor
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Anul apariției20212010
Autorul originalPamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TipRanked criteria interrelationship weighting (non-pairwise sequential)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Sursa seminalăPamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D. (2021). Development of an alternative approach for the selection of suppliers under the conditions of fuzzy sets. Symmetry link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Denumiri alternative
Înrudite88
RezumatDIBR (Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: DIBR · ARAS. Preluat la 2026-06-17 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare