Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Metoda Jurnalului× | Interviu semi-structurat× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu≠ | Metodologia anchetelor | Calitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1920s–1940s (systematised by Allport, 1942) | 1946 (Merton & Kendall); codified as a standard method through the 1980s–1990s |
| Autorul original≠ | Gordon Allport (systematic social-science use); Nels Anderson (early fieldwork diaries) | Robert K. Merton and Patricia Kendall (focused interview, 1946); further systematised by Steinar Kvale |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative / mixed-methods data-collection technique | Qualitative research method |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Alaszewski, A. (2006). Using Diaries for Social Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761941415 | Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761925422 |
| Denumiri alternative | diary study, diary technique, self-report diary, daily diary method | guided interview, semi-standardized interview, focused interview, SSI |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | The diary method is a data-collection technique in which participants record their thoughts, behaviours, events, or experiences in their own words at regular or event-contingent intervals over a defined study period. By capturing data close in time to the event, diaries reduce retrospective recall bias and give researchers access to the texture of everyday life as it unfolds — something one-off surveys and retrospective interviews cannot provide. | The semi-structured interview is a qualitative data-collection method in which the researcher prepares a set of key questions or topic areas in advance but remains free to probe, follow up, and reorder as the conversation evolves. Unlike structured interviews — which fix every question and sequence — or unstructured interviews — which are entirely open — the semi-structured format balances comparability across participants with the flexibility needed to capture the depth and nuance of individual perspectives. It is the most widely used interview format in social science, health, and education research. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|