Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Metoda Jurnalului× | Note de teren× | Observație Participantă× | Jurnal de cercetare× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domeniu≠ | Metodologia anchetelor | Metodologia anchetelor | Cercetare calitativă | Metodologia anchetelor |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1920s–1940s (systematised by Allport, 1942) | Late 19th century (formalized in 20th century) | 1922 | 1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology |
| Autorul original≠ | Gordon Allport (systematic social-science use); Nels Anderson (early fieldwork diaries) | Rooted in 19th-century anthropology and sociology; systematized by ethnographers such as Bronislaw Malinowski and later Robert Emerson et al. | Bronislaw Malinowski | Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment) |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative / mixed-methods data-collection technique | Qualitative data collection and recording technique | Method | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Alaszewski, A. (2006). Using Diaries for Social Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761941415 | Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226206813 | Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books. ISBN: 978-0465026432 | Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | diary study, diary technique, self-report diary, daily diary method | fieldnotes, observational notes, ethnographic notes, jottings | ethnographic observation, participatory observation, overt observation, immersive observation | researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | The diary method is a data-collection technique in which participants record their thoughts, behaviours, events, or experiences in their own words at regular or event-contingent intervals over a defined study period. By capturing data close in time to the event, diaries reduce retrospective recall bias and give researchers access to the texture of everyday life as it unfolds — something one-off surveys and retrospective interviews cannot provide. | Field notes are detailed written records created by researchers during or immediately after direct observation in a naturalistic setting. They capture what is seen, heard, and experienced — including behaviors, interactions, physical environments, and the researcher's own analytic impressions — forming the primary data source for ethnographic and observational studies. | Participant observation is a qualitative research method in which the researcher embeds themselves within a community, organization, or social setting for an extended period, engaging in the activities and relationships of the group while systematically observing and documenting behavior, interactions, and cultural meaning. Pioneered by Malinowski in the 1920s and developed in anthropology, the method has been adopted across sociology, education, health sciences, and organizational research. The researcher functions as both insider (participating in group activities) and outsider (maintaining analytical distance), generating thick description—rich accounts of context, behavior, and meaning that reveal how people actually live and interact. | A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|
|
|