Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Extensia Fuzzy Dual Hesitantă a TOPSIS× | Proces Ierarhic Analitic× | Metoda Best-Worst× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2020 | 1980 | 2015 |
| Autorul original≠ | Wang, R., Li, W., Zhang, T., Han, Q. | Saaty, T. L. | Rezaei, J. |
| Tip≠ | Dual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Wang, R., Li, W., Zhang, T., Han, Q. (2020). New Distance Measures for Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Symmetry DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | DHF-TOPSIS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, R., Li, W., Zhang, T., Han, Q. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|
|