Compară metode

	Deterrence Analysis	Routine Activity Theory
Domeniu	Criminology	Criminology
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Anul apariției	1968	1979
Autorul original	Cesare Beccaria & Jeremy Bentham (classical); Gary Becker & Daniel Nagin (modern)	Lawrence E. Cohen & Marcus Felson
Tip	Theory and empirical analysis of how punishment deters offending	Theoretical framework for explaining the occurrence of predatory crime
Sursa seminală	Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century: A review of the evidence. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 199–263.	Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.
Denumiri alternative	Deterrence Theory, Certainty-Severity-Celerity Analysis, Perceptual Deterrence Analysis, Focused Deterrence Analysis	RAT, Routine Activities Approach, Crime Triangle Framework, Cohen-Felson Theory
Înrudite	4	4
Rezumat	Deterrence analysis studies how the threat and imposition of legal punishment discourage crime. Rooted in classical criminology and formalized in Gary Becker's economic model, it distinguishes the certainty, severity, and celerity of punishment, separates perceived from objective sanction risk, and uses quasi-experimental and perceptual evidence — synthesized by Daniel Nagin — to test how much, and through what channels, punishment actually deters.	Routine activity theory explains predatory crime not by the supply of motivated offenders but by the everyday structure of legal activities that brings offenders, targets, and the absence of guardians together in space and time. Proposed by Lawrence Cohen and Marcus Felson in 1979, it argues that crime rates can rise even when offender motivation is constant, because changes in how people work, shop, and spend leisure time alter the opportunities for crime.