Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Scala Valorilor Democratice× | Scala de încredere instituțională× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Sociologie politică | Sociologie politică |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1999–2015 | 1975–2011 |
| Autorul original≠ | Russell Dalton, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Christian Welzel | David Easton, Marc Hetherington, Pippa Norris |
| Tip | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press. link ↗ | Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | DVS, Democratic Attitudes Scale | ITS, Institutional Confidence Index |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | The Democratic Values Scale measures commitment to core principles of democratic governance including free speech, rule of law, fair elections, protection of minorities, and transparent institutions. Rather than measuring support for democracy as a system (which is nearly universal in principle), it captures depth of commitment to democratic norms, tolerance for dissent, and willingness to protect rights of political opponents. Developed by comparative political scientists including Dalton, Klingemann, and Welzel, it reveals psychological foundations of democratic stability. | The Institutional Trust Scale measures an individual's confidence and trust in formal political and social institutions including parliament, courts, police, media, and civil service. Distinct from generalized interpersonal trust, institutional trust reflects belief in the legitimacy, fairness, and effectiveness of formal organizations that structure governance and public life. Developed in political science by scholars including David Easton and Marc Hetherington, it is a key indicator of democratic health and governance legitimacy. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|