Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Experiment de Câmp cu Design Crossover× | Design cu linii de bază multiple× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Design experimental | Design experimental |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1960s–1970s (field experiment framework); crossover application in non-clinical fields from 1980s onward | 1968 |
| Autorul original≠ | Crossover design principles attributed to R. A. Fisher (1930s); field experiment tradition developed by Donald T. Campbell and Julian Stanley (1960s) | Donald M. Baer, Montrose M. Wolf, Todd R. Risley |
| Tip≠ | Within-subject experimental design conducted in naturalistic settings | Single-subject experimental design |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Senn, S. (2002). Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471496533 | Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | within-subject field experiment, crossover field trial, repeated-measures field experiment, field crossover design | MBD, multiple-baseline single-case design, staggered baseline design, multiple-probe design |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | A crossover field experiment is a within-subject experimental design conducted outside the laboratory in naturalistic, real-world settings. Each participant or unit receives multiple treatments in a randomized sequence, separated by washout periods, allowing researchers to observe causal effects while each unit serves as its own control. This approach combines the internal validity of crossover designs with the ecological validity characteristic of field experimentation. | The multiple baseline design is a single-subject experimental design that demonstrates functional control by introducing an intervention at staggered time points across two or more baselines — typically across different behaviors, individuals, or settings. Because no withdrawal of treatment is required, it is especially suitable when the target behavior is irreversible or when removing an effective intervention would be unethical. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|