Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Design ABAB× | Design cu linii de bază multiple× | Studiul clinic randomizat (SCR)× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Design experimental | Design experimental | Design experimental |
| Familie≠ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Hypothesis test |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1960s–1970s | 1968 | 1948 |
| Autorul original≠ | Murray Sidman and colleagues in applied behavior analysis | Donald M. Baer, Montrose M. Wolf, Todd R. Risley | James Lind (early precursor, 1747); modern formulation: Austin Bradford Hill & Medical Research Council (1948) |
| Tip≠ | Single-subject experimental design | Single-subject experimental design | Interventional comparative study |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change (3rd ed.). Pearson. ISBN: 978-0205474929 | Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. DOI ↗ | Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Moher, D., for the CONSORT Group (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | ABAB reversal design, reversal design, withdrawal design, ABAB single-subject design | MBD, multiple-baseline single-case design, staggered baseline design, multiple-probe design | RCT, randomised controlled trial, clinical trial, Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma (RCT) Tasarımı |
| Înrudite≠ | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Rezumat≠ | The crossover ABAB design is a single-subject experimental design that alternates between baseline (A) and intervention (B) conditions twice within the same participant. By withdrawing and reintroducing the treatment, the researcher can demonstrate experimental control: if behavior improves with B and reverts with A, the causal link between the intervention and the outcome is established without a separate control group. | The multiple baseline design is a single-subject experimental design that demonstrates functional control by introducing an intervention at staggered time points across two or more baselines — typically across different behaviors, individuals, or settings. Because no withdrawal of treatment is required, it is especially suitable when the target behavior is irreversible or when removing an effective intervention would be unethical. | A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard experimental design in clinical and health research, in which participants are randomly allocated to a treatment group or a control group so that the effect of an intervention can be measured with the highest possible degree of internal validity. The modern parallel-group RCT was formalized by Austin Bradford Hill and the Medical Research Council in their landmark streptomycin trial of 1948, and its reporting is governed today by the CONSORT 2010 guidelines (Schulz et al., 2010). |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|
|