Compară metode

	Designul studiului transversal	Designul de studiu de cohortă
Domeniu	Cercetare clinică	Cercetare clinică
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Anul apariției	1950s-1970s	1970s-1980s
Autorul original	Epidemiologists in the mid-20th century; formalized by Kelsey, Rothman, and others	Donald Acheson, Olli Miettinen, and others in modern epidemiology
Tip	Research Design	Research Design
Sursa seminală	Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195083299	Miettinen, O. S. (1976). Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 103(2), 226–235.
Denumiri alternative	prevalence study, cross-sectional survey, snapshot study, survey design	prospective study, follow-up study, longitudinal study, cohort study
Înrudite	2	2
Rezumat	A cross-sectional study (or prevalence study) measures exposure and outcome simultaneously at a single point in time, producing a 'snapshot' of a population. Respondents are recruited and surveyed (or examined) on the same occasion, capturing current prevalence of both exposure and disease. Cross-sectional studies are simple, quick, and inexpensive, making them popular for needs assessments, surveillance, and generating hypotheses—though they cannot establish causality due to lack of temporal sequence.	A cohort study follows a group of individuals forward in time from exposure to outcome. Exposed and unexposed participants (or participants with differing exposure levels) are enrolled at baseline, characterized, and observed prospectively until the outcome occurs or the study ends. Cohort studies are fundamental to epidemiology and are the design of choice for establishing causal associations when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical.