Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiza critică a discursului× | Analiza Tematică× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu≠ | Calitativ | Cercetare calitativă |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) | 2006 |
| Autorul original≠ | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Înrudite≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|