Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiza critică a discursului× | Analiza Discursului× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu≠ | Calitativ | Cercetare calitativă |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Autorul original≠ | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Înrudite≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Rezumat≠ | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|