ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Evaluare Proporțională Complexă×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
DomeniuLuarea deciziilorLuarea deciziilor
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Anul apariției19961995
Autorul originalZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Sursa seminalăZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Denumiri alternative
Înrudite88
RezumatCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: COPRAS · CRITIC. Preluat la 2026-06-17 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare