Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiza de conținut× | Cercetarea prin focus grup× | Tehnica Grupului Nominal× | Interviul Structurat× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domeniu≠ | Calitativ | Calitativ | Calitativ | Metodologia anchetelor |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018 | 1940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990s | 1971 | 1940s–1950s |
| Autorul original≠ | Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research | Robert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. Krueger | André L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de Ven | Survey research tradition; formalized by Campbell, Katona, and Kahn in mid-20th century |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative / mixed-method research technique | Qualitative data collection method | Qualitative research method | Quantitative / mixed data collection technique |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661 | Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244 | Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗ | Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 645–672). Sage. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | İçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis | focus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup Araştırması | NGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group method | standardized interview, formal interview, schedule-based interview, fixed-format interview |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material. | Focus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting. | The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts. | A structured interview is a data collection technique in which every participant is asked exactly the same pre-specified questions in the same order, using standardized wording. Because the interview schedule is fixed, responses across participants are directly comparable, enabling quantitative aggregation and statistical analysis. It sits at the most standardized end of the interview continuum, between the self-administered questionnaire and the semi-structured interview. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|
|
|