Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiza computerizată adaptivă a itemilor× | Analiza factoriala confirmatorie (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Psihometrie | Psihometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1970s–1990s | 1969 |
| Autorul original≠ | Lord, Weiss, and colleagues in psychometric research on adaptive testing | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Tip≠ | Item calibration and evaluation | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Sursa seminală≠ | van der Linden, W. J. & Glas, C. A. W. (Eds.) (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN: 978-0792365556 | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | CAT item analysis, adaptive item calibration, IRT-based CAT item evaluation, adaptive item parameter estimation | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Înrudite≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | Computerized adaptive test item analysis evaluates and calibrates items intended for use in adaptive testing environments. Unlike fixed-form analysis, it accounts for the non-random item exposure inherent in adaptive administration, using item response theory to estimate item parameters, information functions, and exposure rates across the ability continuum. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|