Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Etnografia Digitală Comparativă× | Studiu de caz comparativ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Calitativ | Calitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1995–2000 (multi-sited framework 1995; virtual ethnography 2000) | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| Autorul original≠ | Christine Hine (digital ethnography); George E. Marcus (multi-sited ethnography) | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761958963 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| Denumiri alternative | CDE, multi-site digital ethnography, cross-platform ethnography, comparative virtual ethnography | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | Comparative Digital Ethnography (CDE) is a qualitative design that applies ethnographic methods — sustained participant observation, interview, and artefact analysis — across two or more digital settings simultaneously. By systematically comparing practices, meanings, and interactions in different online environments (e.g., distinct platforms, communities, or national contexts), CDE surfaces both site-specific patterns and cross-cutting cultural logics that a single-site study would miss. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|