Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Teoria fundamentată constructivistă comparativă× | Teoria fundamentată comparativă× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Calitativ | Calitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2000s (Charmaz 2000; extended comparatively through 2006–2014) | 1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward |
| Autorul original≠ | Kathy Charmaz (constructivist strand); comparative application developed in qualitative methodology literature | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars |
| Tip | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973133 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 |
| Denumiri alternative | Comparative CGT, cross-group constructivist grounded theory, comparative Charmaz grounded theory, multi-site constructivist grounded theory | cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis |
| Înrudite | 6 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | Comparative Constructivist Grounded Theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist strand of grounded theory with an explicit comparative design, deliberately collecting and analyzing data from two or more groups, settings, or time points to build a theory that accounts for variation and similarity across contexts. The constructivist perspective treats categories and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants rather than discovered objectively from data. | Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|