Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Cercetare confirmativă comparativă× | Cercetare bazată pe testarea ipotezelor× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Design de cercetare | Design de cercetare |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1971 (Jöreskog); systematized in organizational research by 2000 | Early 20th century (Fisher 1925; Neyman–Pearson 1933) |
| Autorul original≠ | Karl Jöreskog (multigroup CFA foundation); Robert Vandenberg & Charles Lance (organizational application) | Karl Pearson, Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, Egon Pearson |
| Tip≠ | Quantitative comparative research design | Quantitative confirmatory research design |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ | Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030417603 |
| Denumiri alternative | multigroup confirmatory research, cross-group confirmatory study, comparative hypothesis testing design, comparative model testing research | hypothetico-deductive research, confirmatory quantitative research, null hypothesis significance testing, NHST design |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | Comparative confirmatory research tests whether a pre-specified theoretical model or set of hypotheses holds equivalently across two or more distinct groups, time points, or contexts. It extends standard confirmatory analysis by explicitly imposing and evaluating equality constraints across groups, determining not only whether a model fits the data but whether its structure, factor loadings, and parameter estimates are comparable across populations. This design is foundational to cross-cultural, multi-site, and subgroup comparison studies. | Hypothesis testing research is a quantitative design in which the investigator derives one or more explicit, falsifiable propositions from theory, translates them into a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1), collects empirical data, and then applies an inferential statistical test to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to reject H0. The approach is the dominant paradigm for confirmatory science across the social, behavioral, health, and natural sciences. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|