Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Teoria clasică fundamentată comparativă× | Teoria fundamentată constructivistă comparativă× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Calitativ | Calitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1967 (classic GT); comparative application formalised 1970s–1990s | 2000s (Charmaz 2000; extended comparatively through 2006–2014) |
| Autorul original≠ | Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); comparative design extended by Glaser | Kathy Charmaz (constructivist strand); comparative application developed in qualitative methodology literature |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative theory-building design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973133 |
| Denumiri alternative | Glaserian comparative grounded theory, classic GT comparative design, comparative CGT, multi-site classic grounded theory | Comparative CGT, cross-group constructivist grounded theory, comparative Charmaz grounded theory, multi-site constructivist grounded theory |
| Înrudite | 6 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | Comparative classic grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies Glaser and Strauss's original Glaserian grounded theory procedures across two or more deliberately selected comparison groups, settings, or time points. The constant comparative method — the analytical engine of classic GT — is extended systematically across sites so that the emerging substantive theory accounts for variation in the phenomenon across different contexts, populations, or conditions. | Comparative Constructivist Grounded Theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist strand of grounded theory with an explicit comparative design, deliberately collecting and analyzing data from two or more groups, settings, or time points to build a theory that accounts for variation and similarity across contexts. The constructivist perspective treats categories and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants rather than discovered objectively from data. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|