Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Autoetnografie comparativă× | Cercetarea narativă comparativă× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Calitativ | Calitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~2013 | 1990s–2000s |
| Autorul original≠ | Hayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & Hernandez | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); comparative extension by the broader qualitative comparative tradition |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948 | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 |
| Denumiri alternative | collaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAE | comparative narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, narrative comparison, comparative narrative analysis |
| Înrudite | 6 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | Comparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth. | Comparative narrative research is a qualitative design that collects personal stories or life accounts from two or more participants, groups, or contexts and systematically compares them to reveal patterns, contrasts, and contextual influences. Drawing on narrative inquiry's attention to experience-as-story, it adds a deliberate comparative logic to identify what is shared, what diverges, and why differences emerge across cases. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|