Compară metode

	Autoetnografie comparativă	Studiu de caz comparativ
Domeniu	Calitativ	Calitativ
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Anul apariției	1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~2013	1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake)
Autorul original	Hayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & Hernandez	Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake
Tip	Qualitative research design	Qualitative / mixed research design
Sursa seminală	Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948	Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
Denumiri alternative	collaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAE	cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis
Înrudite	6	4
Rezumat	Comparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth.	Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods.