Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Scala pentru atitudinea față de schimbările climatice× | Scala Noului Paradigme Ecologic× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Psihologia mediului | Psihologia mediului |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2019 | 2000 |
| Autorul original≠ | Hui Li, Marianne C. Monroe | Riley E. Dunlap |
| Tip≠ | Self-report belief and attitude scale | Self-report Likert scale |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Li, H., & Monroe, M. C. (2019). Development and validation of the Climate Change Attitude Scale (CCAS). Climatic Change, 152(3–4), 601–613. link ↗ | Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP). Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | CCAS, Climate Attitude Scale | NEP, New Environmental Paradigm Scale |
| Înrudite≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | The Climate Change Attitude Scale (CCAS) measures individuals' beliefs about climate change causation, severity, and human responsibility, as well as attitudes toward climate action and climate policy. Developed by Li and Monroe (2019) as an extension of general environmental attitude scales, the CCAS focuses specifically on climate change perceptions—whether individuals believe climate change is real, anthropogenic (human-caused), severe, and actionable. The scale is essential for tracking public opinion on climate, identifying populations skeptical of climate science, evaluating climate communication campaign effectiveness, and examining links between climate beliefs and policy support or climate action. | The New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale measures endorsement of an ecocentric worldview that views humans as embedded within, rather than dominant over, nature. Developed by Dunlap et al. (2000) to update the original 1978 scale, the NEP assesses environmental beliefs across multiple dimensions including balance of nature, limits to growth, human exceptionalism, and nature's intrinsic value. It is widely used in environmental psychology, sustainability research, and conservation communication studies. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|