Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Corelația criteriilor și ponderarea obiectivă a deviației standard× | Evaluare Aditivă a Raportului× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției | 2010 | 2010 |
| Autorul original≠ | Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Tip≠ | Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|