Compară metode

	Sistemul de Evaluare CAMELS	Scoring de credit (Scorecards, WoE/IV)
Domeniu	Finanțe	Finanțe
Familie	Process / pipeline	Regression model
Anul apariției	1998	1997
Autorul original	US bank supervisory framework; Cole & Gunther	Hand & Henley; Thomas, Edelman & Crook
Tip	Composite supervisory rating	Supervised binary classification model
Sursa seminală	Cole, R. A., & Gunther, J. W. (1998). Predicting bank failures: A comparison of on- and off-site monitoring systems. Journal of Financial Services Research, 13(2), 103–117.	Hand, D. J., & Henley, W. E. (1997). Statistical classification methods in consumer credit scoring: a review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 160(3), 523–541.
Denumiri alternative	CAMELS Framework, Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System, UFIRS, CAMELS Derecelendirme Sistemi	Credit Scorecard, Application Scoring, Behavioural Scoring, Kredi Skorlama
Înrudite	3	3
Rezumat	The CAMELS Rating System is a supervisory framework used by US bank regulators to evaluate the overall condition of financial institutions across six dimensions: Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management, Earnings, Liquidity, and Sensitivity to Market Risk. Each component is scored on a scale of 1 (strong) to 5 (critically deficient), and a composite score is assigned based on examiner judgment. Developed in the US federal banking regulatory context, CAMELS emerged as the standard on-site examination tool and has since been adopted and adapted by regulators globally.	Credit scoring is a statistical technique that estimates the probability that a borrower will default on a financial obligation. Using Weight of Evidence (WoE) binning, Information Value (IV) variable selection, and logistic regression, it converts raw applicant data into a single integer score. Formalized by Hand and Henley (1997) and elaborated by Thomas, Edelman, and Crook, the scorecard framework has become the regulatory standard for retail credit risk assessment in banking, lending, and insurance.