Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Capitol de carte× | Recenzie narativă a literaturii× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Scriere academică | Scriere academică |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1750 | 1900 |
| Autorul original≠ | Publishing tradition (18th century onward) | Research community (traditional academic writing format) |
| Tip | Document Type | Document Type |
| Sursa seminală≠ | American Psychological Association (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA. ISBN: 978-1-4338-3216-1 | Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | chapter, edited volume contribution, book contribution, invited chapter | narrative review, literature survey, interpretive review, state-of-the-art review |
| Înrudite≠ | 2 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | A book chapter is an original scholarly contribution comprising a single chapter within an edited academic volume (book). Unlike journal articles (independent publications in a periodical), book chapters are integrated parts of a larger work edited by one or more scholars. Book chapters allow greater length (5,000–15,000 words typical) and flexible formats compared to journal articles. Edited volumes are common in humanities, social sciences, and professional fields; some disciplines (especially sciences) emphasize single-authored or journal-edited books over edited volumes. Book chapters provide substantial scholarly venues for specialized research, methodological essays, and interdisciplinary synthesis. | A narrative literature review is an interpretive synthesis of published research organized around themes, concepts, or historical progression rather than systematic search. Unlike systematic reviews, narrative reviews employ subjective study selection, do not require protocol registration, and prioritize depth of interpretation over exhaustive comprehensiveness. Narrative reviews are valuable for conceptual synthesis, exploring emerging fields with sparse literature, and providing historical context; they have been the traditional form of scholarly literature synthesis since the inception of academic journals. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|