Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiză Științometrică Asistată de bibliometrix× | Analiza scientometrică× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Scientometrie | Scientometrie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2017 (bibliometrix package); scientometrics as a field: 1969 | 1969 (term); 1963 (Price's foundational work) |
| Autorul original≠ | Massimo Aria & Corrado Cuccurullo (bibliometrix package); scientometrics founded by Derek J. de Solla Price | V. V. Nalimov and Z. M. Mulchenko (term coined); Derek J. de Solla Price (foundational methods) |
| Tip≠ | Quantitative literature analysis workflow | Quantitative literature analysis |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI ↗ | Nalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya: Izucheniye razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa [Scientometrics: The Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process]. Nauka. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | bibliometrix scientometrics, R-based scientometric analysis, bibliometrix workflow, science-of-science analysis with bibliometrix | scientometrics, science of science, quantitative science studies, research evaluation analysis |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | bibliometrix-assisted scientometric analysis is a reproducible, R-based workflow that applies the bibliometrix package to analyse the structure and dynamics of scientific fields using publication metadata. It integrates descriptive statistics, citation metrics, and network analysis — co-citation, bibliographic coupling, co-authorship, and co-word — into a single scriptable environment, enabling systematic, transparent mapping of research landscapes at scale. | Scientometric analysis applies statistical and computational methods to publication and citation data to measure the growth, structure, and impact of scientific fields. Drawing on databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, or OpenAlex, it quantifies output trends, identifies leading authors and institutions, maps intellectual networks, and evaluates research impact — transforming large bibliographic corpora into evidence-based portraits of how knowledge develops and spreads. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|