Compară metode

	Revizuire narativă asistată de bibliometrie	Recenzie narativă
Domeniu	Scientometrie	Scientometrie
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Anul apariției	2017 (bibliometrix package); narrative review methodology is older	Pre-20th century practice; peer-reviewed methodological guidance from 2000s onward
Autorul original	Aria & Cuccurullo (bibliometrix R package); narrative review as a traditional form predates this tool	Traditional academic practice; formalized discussion by Green, Johnson & Adams (2006)
Tip	Mixed quantitative-qualitative review methodology	Literature review methodology
Sursa seminală	Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.	Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117.
Denumiri alternative	bibliometrix narrative review, R-bibliometrix narrative synthesis, quantitative-assisted narrative review	traditional review, expert review, unsystematic review, narrative synthesis
Înrudite	6	6
Rezumat	A bibliometrix-assisted narrative review combines the quantitative field-mapping capabilities of the bibliometrix R package with the interpretive flexibility of a traditional narrative review. Bibliometric indicators — publication trends, author and country productivity, co-citation networks, keyword co-occurrence — are computed and visualised first to orient the reviewer, then a discursive, thematic narrative synthesises the intellectual content of key sources. The result is a structured yet flexible overview of a field that is more transparent and reproducible than a purely informal narrative.	A narrative review is a broad, author-directed synthesis of published literature on a topic, written to summarize, interpret, and contextualize existing knowledge without following the rigorous, pre-registered search and selection protocols that characterize systematic reviews. It draws on the author's expertise to weave disparate sources into a coherent account that identifies themes, debates, and directions for future research.