ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Extensia bipolară a EDAS×Metoda de ponderare obiectivă CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs)×
DomeniuLuarea deciziilorLuarea deciziilor
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Anul apariției20212016
Autorul originalJana, C., Pal, M.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TipBipolar outranking/ranking — Bipolar Fuzzy Set (BFS: positive membership μ⁺ ∈ [0,1], negative μ⁻ ∈ [-1,0])Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Sursa seminalăJana, C., Pal, M. (2021). Extended bipolar fuzzy EDAS approach for multi-criteria group decision-making process. Computational and Applied Mathematics DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Denumiri alternative
Înrudite88
RezumatBF-EDAS (Bipolar extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Jana, C., Pal, M. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: BF-EDAS · CILOS. Preluat la 2026-06-17 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare