Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Extensia bipolară a EDAS× | Proces Ierarhic Analitic× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2021 | 1980 |
| Autorul original≠ | Jana, C., Pal, M. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tip≠ | Bipolar outranking/ranking — Bipolar Fuzzy Set (BFS: positive membership μ⁺ ∈ [0,1], negative μ⁻ ∈ [-1,0]) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Jana, C., Pal, M. (2021). Extended bipolar fuzzy EDAS approach for multi-criteria group decision-making process. Computational and Applied Mathematics DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | BF-EDAS (Bipolar extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Jana, C., Pal, M. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|