Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Testul de Causalitate Bayesian Toda-Yamamoto× | Testul de cauzalitate Granger× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Econometrie | Econometrie |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1995 (base); Bayesian variant developed post-2000 | 1969 |
| Autorul original≠ | Toda & Yamamoto (1995) for the frequentist base; Bayesian extension by subsequent applied econometricians | Clive W. J. Granger |
| Tip≠ | Causality test / VAR-based inference | Time-series predictive causality test |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250. DOI ↗ | Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | Bayesian TY causality, Bayesian modified Wald causality, Bayesian Granger non-causality in VAR, BTY causality | Granger causality test, Granger non-causality test, predictive causality test, Granger Nedensellik Testi |
| Înrudite≠ | 3 | 5 |
| Rezumat≠ | The Bayesian Toda-Yamamoto causality procedure combines the Toda-Yamamoto VAR augmentation strategy — which sidesteps the need for pre-testing integration and cointegration — with Bayesian prior-posterior updating. It tests Granger non-causality between time series that may be integrated or cointegrated without requiring differencing or error-correction modeling, while incorporating prior information and producing full posterior distributions over the causal parameters. | The Granger causality test, introduced by Clive W. J. Granger in 1969, assesses whether the past values of one time series help predict another beyond what the latter's own past already explains. It defines causality in a strictly predictive sense rather than as a structural or physical cause. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|