Compară metode

	Ponderare prin Inversul Probabilității Bayesiene	Potrivire Bazată pe Scorul de Propensitate Bayesian
Domeniu	Inferență cauzală	Inferență cauzală
Familie	Regression model	Regression model
Anul apariției	2015	2012
Autorul original	Saarela, Stephens, Moodie & Klein (2015); Liao & Zigler (2020)	Kaplan & Chen (2012); foundational PSM by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)
Tip	Bayesian causal weighting estimator	Bayesian causal inference / matching
Sursa seminală	Saarela, O., Stephens, D. A., Moodie, E. E. M., & Klein, M. B. (2015). On risk prediction and characterisation of treatment effects in a Bayesian framework using the propensity score. Statistics in Medicine, 34(14), 2170-2185.	Kaplan, D., & Chen, J. (2012). A Two-Step Bayesian Approach for Propensity Score Analysis: Simulations and Case Study. Psychometrika, 77(3), 581-609.
Denumiri alternative	Bayesian IPW, BIPW, Bayesian propensity-weighted estimation, Bayesian marginal structural weighting	Bayesian PSM, BPSM, Bayesian matching estimator, Bayesian propensity weighting
Înrudite	6	6
Rezumat	Bayesian Inverse Probability Weighting (Bayesian IPW) extends the classical IPW estimator by placing prior distributions over the propensity-score model parameters and propagating that uncertainty into the causal-effect estimate. The result is a posterior distribution for the average treatment effect that fully accounts for both propensity-score estimation uncertainty and outcome-model uncertainty, enabling credible-interval inference rather than relying on asymptotic approximations.	Bayesian Propensity Score Matching (Bayesian PSM) extends classical propensity score matching by placing a prior distribution over the propensity model parameters and propagating posterior uncertainty through the matching and outcome stages. Introduced formally by Kaplan and Chen (2012), it offers a principled account of estimation uncertainty that frequentist matching commonly ignores, and allows incorporation of substantive prior knowledge about treatment selection.