Compară metode

	Diferențe în Diferențe Bayesian	Metoda Controlului Sintetic (MCS)
Domeniu	Inferență cauzală	Inferență cauzală
Familie	Regression model	Regression model
Anul apariției	2015-2023	2003–2010
Autorul original	Li & Marchand (formal Bayesian DiD framework); Brodersen et al. (Bayesian causal inference in time series)	Alberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal (2003); Abadie, Diamond & Hainmueller (2010)
Tip	Bayesian causal inference / panel regression	Quasi-experimental causal inference
Sursa seminală	Li, F., & Marchand, J. (2023). Bayesian inference for difference-in-differences. Econometrics Journal, 26(3), 509-529.	Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505.
Denumiri alternative	Bayesian DiD, Bayes DiD, Bayesian diff-in-diff, Bayesian panel causal estimator	SCM, synthetic control, synth estimator, Abadie-Diamond-Hainmueller method
Înrudite	5	4
Rezumat	Bayesian Difference-in-Differences applies Bayesian statistical inference to the classic DiD design, replacing frequentist point estimates with full posterior distributions over the treatment effect. This yields not only an estimate of the causal effect but also a coherent probability statement about its magnitude and uncertainty, making it especially useful when sample sizes are modest or informative prior knowledge is available.	The Synthetic Control Method estimates the causal effect of a treatment or policy on a single treated unit by constructing a weighted combination of untreated units — the synthetic control — that closely resembles the treated unit before the intervention. The gap between the treated unit and its synthetic counterpart after the intervention is the estimated treatment effect.