Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Authoritarian Dynamic Measurement× | Need for Closure Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Psihologie politică | Psihologie politică |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2005 | 1994 |
| Autorul original≠ | Karen Stenner & Stanley Feldman | Donna M. Webster & Arie W. Kruglanski |
| Tip≠ | Self-report predisposition measure | Self-report individual-difference scale |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521534789 | Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049-1062. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | Child-Rearing Authoritarianism Scale, Stenner Authoritarianism Measure, Authoritarian Predisposition Scale | NFCS, Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, Webster-Kruglanski Scale |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | The authoritarian-dynamic approach, developed by Stenner (2005) and Feldman (2003), measures authoritarianism as a latent predisposition toward favoring social conformity and order over individual autonomy and difference, typically assessed with four forced-choice child-rearing values items rather than attitude statements. Its distinctive claim is that intolerance is a dynamic product of this predisposition interacting with perceived normative threat. | The Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, developed by Webster and Kruglanski (1994), measures a stable individual difference in the desire for a firm, definite answer to a question and an aversion to ambiguity and uncertainty. High need for closure is a key epistemic-motivation construct in political psychology, linked to conservatism, prejudice, intolerance of dissent, and resistance to belief change. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|