Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Authoritarian Dynamic Measurement× | Ethnocentrism Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Psihologie politică | Psihologie politică |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2005 | 2001 |
| Autorul original≠ | Karen Stenner & Stanley Feldman | James W. Neuliep & James C. McCroskey |
| Tip≠ | Self-report predisposition measure | Self-report attitude scale |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521534789 | Neuliep, J. W. (2002). Assessing the reliability and validity of the Generalized Ethnocentrism Scale. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 31(4), 201-215. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | Child-Rearing Authoritarianism Scale, Stenner Authoritarianism Measure, Authoritarian Predisposition Scale | GENE Scale, Ethnocentrism Scale, Generalized Ethnocentrism Scale |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | The authoritarian-dynamic approach, developed by Stenner (2005) and Feldman (2003), measures authoritarianism as a latent predisposition toward favoring social conformity and order over individual autonomy and difference, typically assessed with four forced-choice child-rearing values items rather than attitude statements. Its distinctive claim is that intolerance is a dynamic product of this predisposition interacting with perceived normative threat. | The Generalized Ethnocentrism (GENE) Scale, developed by Neuliep and McCroskey, is a self-report instrument measuring ethnocentrism: the tendency to view one's own group as the center of the social universe and to judge other groups by its standards, with corresponding ingroup preference and outgroup derogation. In political science, the ethnocentrism construct was given prominence by Kinder and Kam's (2009) Us Against Them, which uses survey-based ethnocentrism measures to explain American policy opinion. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|