Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Scala ACAMS (Attitudes toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine Scale)× | Chestionarul privind atitudinea față de medicina integrativă× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Medicină integrativă | Medicină integrativă |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2003 | 2005 |
| Autorul original≠ | Hough, H. J.; Darcey, V. L.; Scofield, R. F. | Bikker, A. P.; Merelle, S. B.; Reinders, M. E. |
| Tip | Self-report scale | Self-report scale |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Hough, H. J., Darcey, V. L., & Scofield, R. F. (2003). Attitudes toward alternative/complementary medicines among pharmacy students, faculty, and preceptors. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 67(3), 85. link ↗ | Bikker, A. P., Merelle, S. B., & Reinders, M. E. (2005). Attitudes towards integrative medicine among healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional survey. Patient Education and Counseling, 56(3), 327–335. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | ACAMS | IMAQ |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | The ACAMS is a self-report instrument measuring healthcare professionals' and students' attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine. Developed in the early 2000s, it assesses openness, acceptance, and perceived legitimacy of CAM alongside conventional medicine, helping identify educational gaps and organizational readiness for integrative practice. | The IMAQ is a 26-item self-report instrument assessing healthcare professionals' attitudes toward integrative medicine—the combined use of conventional and complementary therapies based on evidence and patient-centered values. Developed by Bikker and colleagues, it measures five dimensions of attitudes: cognitive, practical, affective, and social aspects of integrative practice. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|