Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Procesul Analitic al Rețelei (AHP cu feedback și interdependențe)× | CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1996 | 1995 |
| Autorul original≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tip≠ | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|