Compară metode

	Proces Ierarhic Analitic	AHP Fuzzy	Teoria Utilității Multi-atribut
Domeniu	Luarea deciziilor	Luarea deciziilor	Luarea deciziilor
Familie	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Anul apariției	1980	1983	1976
Autorul original	Saaty, T. L.	Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W.	Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H.
Tip	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Pairwise comparison with Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) judgments — umbrella over Van Laarhoven-Pedrycz 1983, Buckley 1985, Chang 1992 extent analysis, Cheng 1996 entropy-based	Additive multi-attribute utility function
Sursa seminală	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems	Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley ISBN: 978-0-521-43883-4
Denumiri alternative	—	—	—
Înrudite	8	8	8
Rezumat	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	FUZZY-AHP (Fuzzy AHP — Fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. in 1976. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.