Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Proces Ierarhic Analitic× | Evaluare bazată pe distanța față de soluția medie× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1980 | 2015 |
| Autorul original≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. |
| Tip≠ | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Distance from average solution |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|