Compară metode

	Proces Ierarhic Analitic	Procesul Analitic al Rețelei (AHP cu feedback și interdependențe)	Metoda Best-Worst	Evaluare Proporțională Complexă
Domeniu	Luarea deciziilor	Luarea deciziilor	Luarea deciziilor	Luarea deciziilor
Familie	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Anul apariției	1980	1996	2015	1996
Autorul original	Saaty, T. L.	Saaty, T. L.	Rezaei, J.	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.
Tip	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)	Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP	Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)
Sursa seminală	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8	Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65
Denumiri alternative	—	—	—	—
Înrudite	8	8	8	8
Rezumat	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.