ScholarGate
Assistente
Process / pipelineField experimental designs

Audit Experiment

An audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness.

Abrir no MethodMindEm breveAplicar, comparar, obter orientação
Ferramentas e recursos
Baixar slides
Aprender e explorar
VídeoEm breve

Leia o método completo

Exclusivo para membros

Entre com uma conta gratuita para ler esta seção.

Entrar

Mapa de métodos

A vizinhança de métodos relacionados — selecione um nó para explorar.

Fontes

  1. Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00515.x
  2. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013. DOI: 10.1257/0002828042002561

Como citar esta página

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Audit Experiment (Correspondence / Field Audit Study). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pt/political-science/audit-experiment

Qual método?

Coloque este método ao lado dos seus pares mais próximos e leia-os lado a lado — a biblioteca dispõe os livros sobre a mesa; a escolha é sua.

Comparar lado a lado

Referenciado por

ScholarGateAudit Experiment (Audit Experiment (Correspondence / Field Audit Study)). Recuperado em 2026-06-24 de https://scholargate.app/pt/political-science/audit-experiment · Conjunto de dados: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026