Clientelism Analysis
Clientelism analysis studies the contingent, direct exchange of material benefits for political support and the broker-mediated networks that make such exchange enforceable. Susan Stokes's 2005 formal model of machine politics, built on evidence from Argentina, showed that clientelism inverts normal democratic accountability: instead of voters holding politicians to account, the party machine holds voters to account, rewarding compliance and punishing defection through brokers who can monitor behavior. Kitschelt and Wilkinson's 2007 comparative volume situated this contingent linkage alongside programmatic competition and mapped its variation across democracies. The analysis combines a network view of the party-broker-client machine with a model of how monitoring through dense social ties sustains the bargain.
Leia o método completo
Entre com uma conta gratuita para ler esta seção.
Mapa de métodos
A vizinhança de métodos relacionados — selecione um nó para explorar.
Fontes
- Stokes, S. C. (2005). Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 315-325. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055405051683 ↗
- Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (Eds.). (2007). Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521690041
Como citar esta página
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Clientelism Analysis (Contingent Exchange and Monitoring Networks). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pt/political-economy/clientelism-analysis
Qual método?
Coloque este método ao lado dos seus pares mais próximos e leia-os lado a lado — a biblioteca dispõe os livros sobre a mesa; a escolha é sua.
- Distributive Politics AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ comparar
- Patronage Network AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ comparar
- Vote Buying AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ comparar
Referenciado por
Métodos semelhantes
Encontrou um problema nesta página? Relate ou sugira uma correção →