Indexing Consistency Analysis
Indexing consistency analysis goes beyond reporting a single agreement number to diagnose why indexing varies and what that variability costs. It distinguishes between-indexer consistency (do different people agree?) from within-indexer consistency (does the same person agree with themselves on re-indexing?), models how factors such as indexing exhaustivity, vocabulary specificity, document subject, and indexer experience drive the variability, and — following Rolling's question of whether consistency stands in for quality — traces how inconsistency degrades retrieval. The aim is actionable: identify the terms, subjects, and conditions where indexers diverge most, and feed that back into guidelines, vocabulary design, and training.
Leia o método completo
Entre com uma conta gratuita para ler esta seção.
Mapa de métodos
A vizinhança de métodos relacionados — selecione um nó para explorar.
Fontes
- Rolling, L. (1981). Indexing consistency, quality and efficiency. Information Processing & Management, 17(2), 69-76. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4573(81)90028-5 ↗
- Zunde, P., & Dexter, M. E. (1969). Indexing consistency and quality. American Documentation, 20(3), 259-267. DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630200313 ↗
- Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521865715
Como citar esta página
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Indexing Consistency Analysis (Diagnosing the Determinants and Retrieval Impact of Indexing Variability). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pt/library-information-science/indexing-consistency-analysis
Qual método?
Coloque este método ao lado dos seus pares mais próximos e leia-os lado a lado — a biblioteca dispõe os livros sobre a mesa; a escolha é sua.
- Cranfield Evaluation ParadigmLibrary Information Science↔ comparar
- Inter-Indexer ConsistencyLibrary Information Science↔ comparar
- Query Log AnalysisLibrary Information Science↔ comparar
Referenciado por
Métodos semelhantes
Encontrou um problema nesta página? Relate ou sugira uma correção →