ScholarGate
Assistente
Process / pipelineCritical disability studies / discourse analysis

Disability Critical Discourse Analysis

Disability critical discourse analysis applies the tools of critical discourse analysis (CDA) to disability, treating disability as a phenomenon that is constructed in and through language. Set out systematically in Jan Grue's 2015 book Disability and Discourse Analysis, the method brings together disability studies and CDA to examine how texts and talk — in media, politics, clinical settings, and everyday life — construe disability, position disabled people, and naturalize particular understandings (deficit, tragedy, rights) through specific linguistic choices. Its distinctive claim is that the language used to talk about disability is not a neutral description of a prior reality but part of how disability is socially produced and contested.

Abrir no MethodMindEm breveAplicar, comparar, obter orientação
Ferramentas e recursos
Baixar slides
Aprender e explorar
VídeoEm breve

Leia o método completo

Exclusivo para membros

Entre com uma conta gratuita para ler esta seção.

Entrar

Mapa de métodos

A vizinhança de métodos relacionados — selecione um nó para explorar.

Fontes

  1. Grue, J. (2015). Disability and Discourse Analysis (Interdisciplinary Disability Studies). Farnham: Ashgate. ISBN: 9781472432926

Como citar esta página

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Disability Critical Discourse Analysis (Disability & Discourse Analysis). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pt/disability-studies/disability-critical-discourse-analysis

Qual método?

Coloque este método ao lado dos seus pares mais próximos e leia-os lado a lado — a biblioteca dispõe os livros sobre a mesa; a escolha é sua.

Comparar lado a lado

Referenciado por

ScholarGateDisability Critical Discourse Analysis (Disability Critical Discourse Analysis (Disability & Discourse Analysis)). Recuperado em 2026-06-24 de https://scholargate.app/pt/disability-studies/disability-critical-discourse-analysis · Conjunto de dados: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026