ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Análise de Modularidade Ponderada×Centralidade de Intermediação×
ÁreaAnálise de redesAnálise de redes
FamíliaMachine learningMachine learning
Ano de origem20041977
Autor originalNewman, M. E. J.Freeman, L. C.
TipoCommunity structure optimization on weighted graphsCentrality measure
Fonte seminalNewman, M. E. J. (2004). Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E, 70(5), 056131. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
Outros nomesweighted modularity, weighted Q optimization, weighted network community detection, strength-based modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Relacionados56
ResumoWeighted modularity analysis extends the classical Newman-Girvan modularity measure to networks where edges carry numeric strengths (frequencies, intensities, costs). By replacing binary adjacency with tie weights, it finds community partitions that reflect how densely interconnected subgroups are relative to what is expected under a weighted null model, yielding more nuanced groupings than unweighted approaches on data where edge strength varies meaningfully.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Weighted Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Recuperado em 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare