ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Revisão Sistemática de Literatura Assistida por VOSviewer×Análise de Co-citação×
ÁreaCientometriaBibliometria
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem2010 (VOSviewer); practice established circa 2012–20151973
Autor originalvan Eck & Waltman (VOSviewer tool); combined with Kitchenham SLR guidelinesHenry Small
TipoMixed bibliometric-qualitative review methodMethod
Fonte seminalvan Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
Outros nomesVOSviewer SLR, bibliometric-enhanced systematic review, VOSviewer-integrated review, visualization-assisted SLRco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Relacionados65
ResumoA VOSviewer-assisted systematic literature review combines the rigorous search-and-appraisal pipeline of a standard systematic review with bibliometric network visualization produced by the VOSviewer software. The approach allows researchers to systematically retrieve and screen the literature while simultaneously mapping co-citation clusters, keyword co-occurrence networks, and institutional collaboration patterns, yielding both a narrative synthesis and a visual, quantitative overview of the field's intellectual structure.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: VOSviewer-assisted systematic literature review · Co-Citation Analysis. Recuperado em 2026-06-20 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare