Comparar métodos

	História oral por elicitação visual	História Oral
Área	Qualitativo	Qualitativo
Família	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Ano de origem	1957 (Collier's foundational experiment); oral history integration developed 1980s–2000s	1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology
Autor original	John Collier Jr. (photo elicitation basis); extended into oral history by visual anthropologists and memory studies scholars	Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork
Tipo	Qualitative interview-based method	Qualitative research method
Fonte seminal	Collier, J. (1957). Photography in anthropology: A report on two experiments. American Anthropologist, 59(5), 843–859.	Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957
Outros nomes	photo-elicitation oral history, image-elicitation life history, visual oral history interview, VEOH	life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research
Relacionados	4	6
Resumo	Visual elicitation oral history is a qualitative method that uses photographs, objects, maps, or other visual materials as prompts during oral history interviews. By placing a tangible visual anchor before the narrator, the researcher unlocks richer, more detailed memories and personal meanings than spoken questions alone typically produce. The approach merges John Collier Jr.'s photo-elicitation technique with oral history's commitment to capturing first-person lived experience across time.	Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected.