Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Visual Anthropology× | Material Culture Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Anthropology | Anthropology |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2001 | 2012 |
| Autor original≠ | Visual anthropology tradition (synthesized by Marcus Banks; ethnographic film lineage) | Material culture studies tradition (Ian Hodder; Appadurai/Kopytoff object-biography lineage) |
| Tipo≠ | Use and analysis of images as ethnographic data and representation | Systematic study of objects as evidence about culture and social relations |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Banks, M. (2001). Visual Methods in Social Research. London: Sage. ISBN: 9780761963646 | Hodder, I. (2012). Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN: 9780470672129 |
| Outros nomes | Visual Ethnography, Ethnographic Film and Photography, Image-Based Anthropology, Anthropology of Visual Media | Material Culture Studies, Object Analysis, Artefact Analysis, Anthropology of Things |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | Visual anthropology is the use and analysis of photography, film, video, and other visual artefacts both as ethnographic evidence about a culture and as a means of representing anthropological knowledge. It encompasses images the researcher makes in the field, images that members of a community produce themselves, and images already circulating within a society, and it studies all of them as social objects with meanings and effects. As Marcus Banks frames it, every image carries an internal narrative — what it depicts — and an external narrative — the social relations of its making, circulation, and use — and visual anthropology attends to both. | Material culture analysis is the systematic study of physical objects and artefacts — tools, clothing, buildings, gifts, commodities, everyday possessions — as evidence about the people and societies that make, use, exchange, and discard them. It treats things not as inert backdrop but as active participants in social life, carrying meanings, structuring practices, and binding people into relationships. Drawing on object-biography thinking and on Ian Hodder's account of human–thing entanglement, it asks what an object's form, history, and circulation can reveal about culture that words alone cannot. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|