ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Verbal-Guise Technique×Matched-Guise Technique×
ÁreaLinguísticaLinguística
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem20101960
Autor originalLanguage-attitudes researchers (variant of Lambert's matched guise; synthesis by Peter Garrett)Wallace Lambert and colleagues
TipoIndirect experimental measure of language attitudesIndirect experimental measure of language attitudes
Fonte seminalGarrett, P. (2010). Attitudes to Language. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521759175Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 44–51. DOI ↗
Outros nomesVerbal Guise Test, Speaker Evaluation Verbal Guise, Verbal-Guise ExperimentMatched Guise Test, Matched-Guise Experiment, Language Attitude Matched Guise
Relacionados32
ResumoThe verbal-guise technique is the naturalistic cousin of the matched-guise technique for measuring language attitudes. Instead of one bidialectal speaker producing every variety, different speakers each produce a single variety, and listeners rate each speaker on personality and status trait scales. This solves the matched-guise problem of finding speakers who can authentically and equivalently perform two or more varieties, and it uses genuine native voices for each variety — but at the cost of reintroducing speaker-to-speaker differences as a potential confound. It remains a core instrument in the speaker-evaluation paradigm for studying covert attitudes toward accents, dialects, and languages.The matched-guise technique is an indirect experimental method for measuring attitudes toward languages, dialects, and accents. Developed by Wallace Lambert and colleagues in 1960, it has the same bilingual or bidialectal speaker record the same passage in two or more language varieties ('guises'); listeners, believing they are hearing different speakers, rate each recording on personality and status traits. Because the voice, content, and delivery are held constant, any differences in the ratings can be attributed to listeners' attitudes toward the variety itself.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Verbal-Guise Technique · Matched-Guise Technique. Recuperado em 2026-06-25 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare