Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Value Conflict Measurement× | Schwartz Value Survey× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Psicologia política | Psicologia política |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1986 | 1992 |
| Autor original≠ | Philip Tetlock; Stanley Feldman & John Zaller | Shalom H. Schwartz |
| Tipo≠ | Measurement of value conflict in political reasoning | Self-report values survey |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A Value Pluralism Model of Ideological Reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 819-827. DOI ↗ | Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. DOI ↗ |
| Outros nomes≠ | Value Pluralism Measurement, Political Ambivalence Measurement, Value Trade-off Measurement, Conflicting Considerations Measure | SVS, Schwartz Theory of Basic Values, Portrait Values Questionnaire |
| Relacionados≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | Value conflict measurement quantifies the tension citizens feel when an issue pits two values they both cherish against each other, and traces its cognitive consequences. Philip Tetlock's value pluralism model holds that people reason in integratively complex ways precisely when an issue activates conflicting values they regard as important and roughly equal in weight. Stanley Feldman and John Zaller showed that this conflict, between values such as equality and economic individualism over the welfare state, produces ambivalence: opinions built from opposing considerations that are unstable and sensitive to how questions are framed. Together these approaches measure value conflict and link it to complexity, ambivalence, and the instability of political attitudes. | The Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) operationalizes Schwartz's (1992) theory of basic human values, which identifies ten (later refined to nineteen) motivationally distinct values organized in a circular structure along two axes: openness to change versus conservation, and self-enhancement versus self-transcendence. It is the most widely used cross-cultural values instrument and underlies much research on the value basis of political ideology. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|